November 2003 Design Session

City of Port St. Lucie Project Summary

[See also the Results page]

The Port St. Lucie area was developed as a residential retirement community, not as a series of neighborhoods in the traditional sense. The City therefore lacks a mixture of uses that would offer retail services or an employment base. Eighty percent of current land uses are residential. With its phenomenal population growth, the City needs to address the issue of providing jobs and commercial development for its residents. The City considers these concerns to be fundamental for the continued health of the local economy. In addition, continued traffic congestion within the city has led Port St. Lucie to launch three separate studies to develop a third east-west transportation corridor from US 1 to I-95 and the Turnpike. The City is looking to develop policies that will promote land uses necessary for the continued successful development. They are looking for the answer to: "What kinds of policies should be put in place in order to encourage the inclusion of retail and office parks in the 42 square mile annexation area?"

Design Institute Recommendations
The City of Port St. Lucie faces both opportunity and challenge in the tremendous population and physical growth that is occurring in their city. The Design Institute's Resource Team began their session by addressing the issue of transportation.

The City's current transportation problems appear to stem from a lack of road connectivity and experts expressed concern over the number of gated communities being developed in the annexation area. Gated communities are viewed as separate enclaves not contributing to a sense of community. Once built, they are extremely difficult to redesign, retrofit or connect to the adjacent community.

The Team recommended the City's north to south connections be encouraged between developments of regional impact (DRIs) that occur west of I-95, in addition to the east-west connections the City is already pursuing.

The Resource Team presented the idea of "mini suburban villages" where densities would be increased in small nodes and would provide for mixed uses and locations for entertainment and shopping. Increasing opportunities for recreation within the City would help to shift the tax base from residential to commercial properties and retain tax money within the City.

Port St. Lucie is limited in their capacity to expand existing commercial nodes and should consider their inclusion in annexed areas. Annexation agreements may be a way in which Port St. Lucie can demand higher standards for new development in addition to demanding the type of development they envision for their city.

Port St. Lucie should see their position as one of strength in bargaining with developers over the future expansion of their city. The Resource Team recommended any proposed annexation be examined carefully to determine the fiscal impact and responsibility it incurs for the City.

When faced with the enormous task of shaping the development of 42 square miles, the City of Port St. Lucie should create a list of community values and indicators. This list could then be measured against future proposed development. This would enable the City to stay focused on long-term goals rather than short-term gains and work towards maintaining values. The community values and indicators list could be an aid in evaluating planning decisions and keep the City moving towards a common goal and vision. The City may wish to consider hiring a consultant to determine the community values and indicators list. Criterion is a West-coast company that has developed successful indicator programs and software. The City of Orlando has adopted indicators to gauge whether a proposed development takes them closer to or away from their stated goals.

The City of Port St. Lucie asked the Design Institute for preparation suggestions for the upcoming ULI Panel Services Program. Considerations included forming a working group now, which would be organized and ready to implement any recommendations of the ULI panel without delay. It might also be useful to ask ULI to create a strategy for addressing regional issues, for example, improving regional relationships with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and Martin and St. Lucie Counties. The Institute also suggested that the City prepare in advance a list of stakeholders to interview, which might include:

  • Possible annex-ees
  • Citizens Against Virtually Everything contingent
  • Council members
  • Public works people

The Resource Team felt that the City of Port St. Lucie has tremendous potential and opportunity for building both their city and their community. The City has the unique opportunity to learn from the past mistakes of other municipalities and the further advantage of being able to control future development through the annexation process. With a cohesive vision for the future, Port St. Lucie can overcome the limitations of its past development decisions and early development patterns.

<< Back to November 2003 Program